本文主要给大家简单讲讲Mysql binlog fORMat三种形式,相关专业术语大家可以上网查查或者找一些相关书籍补充一下,这里就不涉猎了,我们就直奔主题吧,希望mysql binlog format三种
本文主要给大家简单讲讲Mysql binlog fORMat三种形式,相关专业术语大家可以上网查查或者找一些相关书籍补充一下,这里就不涉猎了,我们就直奔主题吧,希望mysql binlog format三种形式这篇文章可以给大家带来一些实际帮助。
分析(本文碰到的案例):
查看Mysql binlog format
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:33:39>show variables like 'binlog_format%'; +---------------+-------+| Variable_name | Value |+---------------+-------+| binlog_format | MIXED |+---------------+-------+
测试语句:
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:24:14>create table tmp_test(id int,name varchar(64),age int,primary key(id)) engine = innodb;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:24:23>insert into tmp_test values(1,'aaa',11);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:17>insert into tmp_test values(2,'bbb',22);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:23>insert into tmp_test values(3,'ccc',33);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:28>insert into tmp_test values(4,'DDD',44);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:34>insert into tmp_test values(5,'eee',55);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:42>select * from tmp_test;+----+------+------+| id | name | age |+----+------+------+| 1 | aaa | 11 || 2 | bbb | 22 || 3 | ccc | 33 || 4 | ddd | 44 || 5 | eee | 55 |+----+------+------+5 rows in set (0.01 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:50>create table tmp_test_bak(id int,name varchar(64),age int,primary key(id)) engine = innodb;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:26:31>insert into tmp_test_bak select * from tmp_test; ###记录成了Row模式Query OK, 5 rows affected (0.03 sec)
Records: 5 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
Binlog 记录图:
问题来了,我想要出来的binlog format是Statement,而不是Row。而一条insert into tb select * from ta的简单语句在Mixed模式下记录了Row模式的binlog。原因是什么?
首先确实在一些特定的情况下,Mixed会被转换成Row模式:
. 当 DML 语句更新一个 NDB 表时;
. 当函数中包含 UUID() 时;
. 2 个及以上包含 AUTO_INCREMENT 字段的表被更新时;
. 执行 INSERT DELAYED 语句时;
. 用 UDF 时;
. 视图中必须要求运用 row 时,例如建立视图时使用了 UUID() 函数;
上面来自网络,有兴趣的可以自己测试测试。而对于本文中的sql,符合不了上面的条件,但binlog也记录成了Row格式。所以还是很奇怪为什么binlog格式被转换了,日常工作的时候有遇到过执行一条sql,会报一个warning:
Warning: Unsafe statement written to the binary log using statement format since BINLOG_FORMAT = STATEMENT
难道因为这个导致转换的?因为上面的SQL可以重现,没有报warning,所以这个情况排除。根据经验想到了一个参数:innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog,看到里面讲到事务隔离级别,那就看看隔离级别的情况:
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 05:46:56>select @@global.tx_isolation;+-----------------------+| @@global.tx_isolation |+-----------------------+| READ-COMMITTED |+-----------------------+1 row in set (0.01 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:36:45>select @@session.tx_isolation;+------------------------+| @@session.tx_isolation |+------------------------+| READ-COMMITTED |+------------------------+1 row in set (0.01 sec)
看到隔离级别是提交读,即不可重复读。把事务隔离级别设置成默认的 REPEATABLE READ:
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:41:02>set session transaction isolation level REPEATABLE READ;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:41:42>select @@session.tx_isolation;+------------------------+| @@session.tx_isolation |+------------------------+| REPEATABLE-READ |+------------------------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)
再执行测试里的SQL,发现这时候Mixed的binlog记录了Statement格式,正常了,符合预期了。难道就是这个事务隔离级别的问题引起的?在手册里发现了这句:
NoteIn MySQL 5.7, when READ COMMITTED isolation level is used, or the deprecated innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog system variable is enabled,
there is no InnoDB gap locking except for foreign-key constraint checking and duplicate-key checking. Also, record locks for nonmatching
rows are released after MySQL has evaluated the WHERE condition.
If you use READ COMMITTED or enable innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog, you must use row-based binary logging.
展开可以看例子:
View Code
经过测试,在5.1、5.5、5.6都有这个情况,可能这个本身就不是问题。:)
MySQL binlog format三种形式就先给大家讲到这里,对于其它相关问题大家想要了解的可以持续关注我们的数据库。我们的板块内容每天都会捕捉一些行业新闻及专业知识分享给大家的。
--结束END--
本文标题: MySQL binlog format三种形式介绍
本文链接: https://lsjlt.com/news/36715.html(转载时请注明来源链接)
有问题或投稿请发送至: 邮箱/279061341@qq.com QQ/279061341
2024-10-23
2024-10-22
2024-10-22
2024-10-22
2024-10-22
2024-10-22
2024-10-22
2024-10-22
2024-10-22
2024-10-22
回答
回答
回答
回答
回答
回答
回答
回答
回答
回答
0